Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication: A case report

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication : A case report. / Ottesen, Camilla; Andersen, Sanne W. M.; Jensen, Simon S.; Kofod, Thomas; Gotfredsen, Klaus.

I: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, Bind 8, Nr. 5, 2022, s. 1059-1067.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ottesen, C, Andersen, SWM, Jensen, SS, Kofod, T & Gotfredsen, K 2022, 'Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication: A case report', Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, bind 8, nr. 5, s. 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.620

APA

Ottesen, C., Andersen, S. W. M., Jensen, S. S., Kofod, T., & Gotfredsen, K. (2022). Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication: A case report. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 8(5), 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.620

Vancouver

Ottesen C, Andersen SWM, Jensen SS, Kofod T, Gotfredsen K. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication: A case report. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2022;8(5):1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.620

Author

Ottesen, Camilla ; Andersen, Sanne W. M. ; Jensen, Simon S. ; Kofod, Thomas ; Gotfredsen, Klaus. / Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication : A case report. I: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2022 ; Bind 8, Nr. 5. s. 1059-1067.

Bibtex

@article{3af93c4b371c4e288fe6b767ac4edf15,
title = "Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication: A case report",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Oral rehabilitation can be a challenge in patients on high-dose antiresorptive medication (HDAR), especially if the alveolar anatomy has changed due to previous medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) resection. In healthy patients, dental implant treatment has found wide acceptance in prosthetic rehabilitation as it increases the patient's oral health-related quality of life. However, it is considered contraindicated in patients on HDAR due to the risk of MRONJ, although a recent feasibility study indicates that implant treatment may indeed be an option in these patients. The aim of the present case report is to illustrate the risk of MRONJ in a patient with cancer on HDAR and to discuss the reasons behind the outcomes of the implant treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient with prostate cancer with bone metastases on high-dose denosumab therapy with previous MRONJ had four implants inserted bilaterally in the maxilla (14, 13, 23, 24). Two identical implant-supported screw-retained cantilever bridges were fabricated. The patient was followed for more than 1 year.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Peri-implantitis, and/or MRONJ, was diagnosed around two of the implants (23, 24), probably induced by crestal bone trauma from a healing abutment and/or a misfitting prosthetic reconstruction. A peri-implantitis operation was performed, but without the desired response, and the two implants (23, 24) were later removed in an MRONJ resection. The implants on the other side of the maxilla (14, 13) remained without complications. Dental implant treatment is feasible in patients on HDAR, but comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus) and polypharmacy (e.g., chemotherapy and steroids) may add to the risk of implant failure. Minimal trauma surgery and prosthodontics are crucial to increase the chance of successful healing in an HDAR patient.",
author = "Camilla Ottesen and Andersen, {Sanne W. M.} and Jensen, {Simon S.} and Thomas Kofod and Klaus Gotfredsen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1002/cre2.620",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1059--1067",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Dental Research",
issn = "2057-4347",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and successful implant treatment in a patient on high-dose antiresorptive medication

T2 - A case report

AU - Ottesen, Camilla

AU - Andersen, Sanne W. M.

AU - Jensen, Simon S.

AU - Kofod, Thomas

AU - Gotfredsen, Klaus

N1 - © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Oral rehabilitation can be a challenge in patients on high-dose antiresorptive medication (HDAR), especially if the alveolar anatomy has changed due to previous medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) resection. In healthy patients, dental implant treatment has found wide acceptance in prosthetic rehabilitation as it increases the patient's oral health-related quality of life. However, it is considered contraindicated in patients on HDAR due to the risk of MRONJ, although a recent feasibility study indicates that implant treatment may indeed be an option in these patients. The aim of the present case report is to illustrate the risk of MRONJ in a patient with cancer on HDAR and to discuss the reasons behind the outcomes of the implant treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient with prostate cancer with bone metastases on high-dose denosumab therapy with previous MRONJ had four implants inserted bilaterally in the maxilla (14, 13, 23, 24). Two identical implant-supported screw-retained cantilever bridges were fabricated. The patient was followed for more than 1 year.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Peri-implantitis, and/or MRONJ, was diagnosed around two of the implants (23, 24), probably induced by crestal bone trauma from a healing abutment and/or a misfitting prosthetic reconstruction. A peri-implantitis operation was performed, but without the desired response, and the two implants (23, 24) were later removed in an MRONJ resection. The implants on the other side of the maxilla (14, 13) remained without complications. Dental implant treatment is feasible in patients on HDAR, but comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus) and polypharmacy (e.g., chemotherapy and steroids) may add to the risk of implant failure. Minimal trauma surgery and prosthodontics are crucial to increase the chance of successful healing in an HDAR patient.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Oral rehabilitation can be a challenge in patients on high-dose antiresorptive medication (HDAR), especially if the alveolar anatomy has changed due to previous medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) resection. In healthy patients, dental implant treatment has found wide acceptance in prosthetic rehabilitation as it increases the patient's oral health-related quality of life. However, it is considered contraindicated in patients on HDAR due to the risk of MRONJ, although a recent feasibility study indicates that implant treatment may indeed be an option in these patients. The aim of the present case report is to illustrate the risk of MRONJ in a patient with cancer on HDAR and to discuss the reasons behind the outcomes of the implant treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A patient with prostate cancer with bone metastases on high-dose denosumab therapy with previous MRONJ had four implants inserted bilaterally in the maxilla (14, 13, 23, 24). Two identical implant-supported screw-retained cantilever bridges were fabricated. The patient was followed for more than 1 year.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Peri-implantitis, and/or MRONJ, was diagnosed around two of the implants (23, 24), probably induced by crestal bone trauma from a healing abutment and/or a misfitting prosthetic reconstruction. A peri-implantitis operation was performed, but without the desired response, and the two implants (23, 24) were later removed in an MRONJ resection. The implants on the other side of the maxilla (14, 13) remained without complications. Dental implant treatment is feasible in patients on HDAR, but comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus) and polypharmacy (e.g., chemotherapy and steroids) may add to the risk of implant failure. Minimal trauma surgery and prosthodontics are crucial to increase the chance of successful healing in an HDAR patient.

U2 - 10.1002/cre2.620

DO - 10.1002/cre2.620

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35894761

VL - 8

SP - 1059

EP - 1067

JO - Clinical and Experimental Dental Research

JF - Clinical and Experimental Dental Research

SN - 2057-4347

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 315394796